LNAT Practice Tests: Free Timed LNAT Simulator
Sit full LNAT practice tests under real conditions. The simulator below runs both sections: 42 multiple-choice questions on 12 passages in 95 minutes, then one essay in 40 minutes, with the same 750-word limit and a clock that keeps running whether you are ready or not. Once you begin Section B you cannot return to Section A, and the simulator enforces that, because it is the rule that costs candidates the most marks.
If you are still planning your preparation, start with our complete guide to the LNAT, which covers registration, key dates, scoring and what counts as a good result.
We currently have 1 full set of LNAT practice questions, with more in development.
Note: To replicate the LNAT test environment, complete the practice test in a quiet environment in full screen.
Find these practice tests useful? Check out our other resources for students sitting the LNAT.
The Complete LNAT Guide
Format, key dates, scoring, universities and a preparation timeline.
LNAT Past Papers and Resources
Both official practice papers, plus the commentary and mark scheme.
Law Personal Statement Examples
Before and after passages from real law personal statements, with analysis.
What the LNAT looks like
The LNAT is two sections sat in a single sitting, two hours and fifteen minutes in total. Section A is 42 multiple-choice questions drawn from 12 argumentative passages, three or four questions per passage, in 95 minutes. Section B is one essay chosen from three prompts, in 40 minutes, with a hard 750-word limit.
The scoring works differently from the other admissions tests. There is no 1.0 to 9.0 scale. Section A is a raw mark out of 42, one point per question, with no negative marking. Average scores sit in the low to mid twenties, applicants to the most selective courses tend to be in the mid to high twenties, and Oxford has reported around 27 for accepted law candidates.
Section B is not given a numerical score at all. It goes to the universities you applied to, and they read and weigh it however they see fit. Oxford marks it by comparative judgement and combines both sections into the ranking that decides who is shortlisted. For a full breakdown of the LNAT’s structure, scoring and which universities require it, read our complete LNAT guide.
Pacing is the skill that decides your score
Ninety-five minutes for 42 questions sounds generous until you remember that you have to read twelve dense argumentative passages inside the same window. The clock is not really counting questions. It is counting reading.
A workable split is roughly two minutes reading each passage, about a minute and a half per question, and ten minutes held back at the end for review. That budget only survives if you protect it: do not sink five minutes into a single stubborn question. Flag it, move on, and come back to it with the review time you deliberately kept.
Two habits are worth drilling until they are automatic. First, answer everything. There is no negative marking, so a blank and a wrong answer cost exactly the same and a last-second guess is free. Second, read each passage properly the first time. Skimming and then hunting back through the text for every question is slower than reading carefully once, and it is the most common way candidates lose the reading budget.
Neither habit can be learned from an untimed question bank. Reading an argument with no clock develops your comprehension and does nothing whatsoever for your triage, which is why timed practice needs to start earlier than most candidates think.
You cannot go back to Section A
The LNAT has one structural rule with no equivalent in the other admissions tests: once you begin Section B, Section A is closed to you permanently. There is no going back to check an answer, no returning to a flagged question, and no borrowing the essay’s 40 minutes to finish the multiple choice.
The practical consequence is that unused Section A time is simply wasted. If you finish the multiple choice with eight minutes to spare, those eight minutes are worth far more spent revisiting flagged questions than banked as a head start on an essay whose clock has not yet begun. Use every minute of the Section A window before you move on.
This is among the easiest things to get wrong on the day and among the easiest to rehearse in advance, which is exactly what the simulator is for. It closes Section A behind you just as the real test does, so the decision to move on is one you will already have made under pressure at least once.
The LNAT can be prepared for, but there are only two official practice papers
The most damaging belief about the LNAT is that you cannot prepare for it. It tests no syllabus, so candidates conclude there is nothing to work on and then walk in cold. That reasoning is half right and entirely wrong: there is no content to revise, but there is a great deal to practise. Critical reading, holding an argument in mind, separating what a passage states from what it merely implies, and answering from the text alone are all trainable skills, and they improve sharply with deliberate practice.
The catch is supply. The LNAT publishes only two official practice papers, with a commentary and a mark scheme. That is not much, and spending both early is a real setback, because they are your only perfectly representative timed practice.
A sensible order of use: build the reading habit on dense argumentative prose you already have to hand, where broadsheet comment and opinion writing works well, use the practice tests above as often as you like to rehearse the interface and the pacing, and hold the two official papers back for full timed run-throughs nearer the test. You can download both official papers, the commentary, the mark scheme and the official guide from our LNAT past papers and resources page.
Common mistakes to avoid
Assuming you cannot prepare. The single biggest LNAT mistake. There is no syllabus, but every skill the test measures improves with practice.
Bringing in outside knowledge. Answer only from the passage. What you happen to know about the topic is irrelevant, and it is usually the bait in a wrong answer.
Reading too fast. Skimming and then hunting back through the passage for every question costs more time than reading it properly once.
Practising untimed. Comfortable, and almost useless on its own. If every question you attempt has unlimited time, you are training a skill the test does not measure.
Moving to Section B with time left over. Section A closes behind you. Unused minutes are gone, not saved.
Neglecting the essay. It carries no score, but universities read it, and at Oxford it feeds directly into the shortlisting ranking.
Spending both official papers too early. There are only two. Ration them for timed run-throughs nearer the test.
Missing the registration or testing deadline. The most damaging LNAT errors are administrative rather than intellectual.
Want expert help with your LNAT preparation?
Our Oxford and Cambridge graduate tutors build targeted plans around your weak sections and the time pressure that trips most candidates up. See how we can help.
Frequently asked questions
No. There are only two official practice papers in the current format, which is precisely the problem this simulator solves. Ours are original sets built to the same structure, so you can rehearse under timed conditions without exhausting the official material.
Yes, free, and no account is needed. We currently have 1 full set of LNAT practice questions, with more in development.
No, and our simulator enforces that, because it is the rule that costs candidates the most marks. Within Section A you can flag and review questions freely. Once you move on to the essay, Section A is closed for good.
No, and neither does the LNAT. Section B is not marked by the LNAT consortium. Your essay is sent to the universities you applied to and they decide how to use it. Cambridge marks it centrally, and Oxford marks it internally and weights it equally with your multiple-choice score at shortlisting.
Section A is out of 42. The most useful published benchmark is Oxford Law’s own admissions report for the 2024-25 cycle: applicants averaged 24.5, shortlisted candidates 29.18, and offer-holders 30.96. Those are Oxford figures and Oxford sits at the top of the range, so treat them as a ceiling rather than a general target.
The LNAT’s own guidance recommends roughly 500 to 600 words within the 40 minutes, against a hard limit of 750. Too short cannot be properly assessed. Too long tends to work against you, because it usually means the argument stopped being controlled.
No. The essay topics are deliberately general, covering ethics, politics, education and society rather than law. What is assessed is whether you can build an argument, handle a counter-argument and reach a conclusion. Legal knowledge earns you nothing, and reaching for it usually costs you clarity.
Once per admissions cycle. Scores are not carried over between years, so if you reapply in a later cycle you must sit it again.
Usually yes. The passages are not ordered by difficulty, so time spent hunting for an easy one is time not spent answering. Read the passage, answer its three or four questions, and move on.